21. Ott MA ainsi que al., The trade-from anywhere between hormonal contraceptives and you can condoms certainly one of teenagers, Viewpoints into Sexual and Reproductive Fitness, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
22. Wilson EK and you may Koo Horsepower, Contacts ranging from low-money women’s relationships services as well as their birth-control fool around with, Perspectives into the Sexual and you will Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC ainsi que al., Family relations and you may buddy closeness in order to teenage sexual lovers into the relationship to condom have fun with, Journal out-of Adolescent Fitness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA ainsi que al., Brand new developmental association of matchmaking quality, hormones contraceptive selection and you may condom non-have fun with certainly one of adolescent female, Record out-of Adolescent Wellness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and Sherblom J, Relational connection and you will threats so you’re able to matchmaking maintenance goals: influences into condom play with, Record away from American College Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty seven. Manning WD ainsi que al., Young adult dating dating therefore the handling of sexual exposure, People Lookup and you may Coverage Remark, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
28. Manlove J ainsi que al., Teen parents in the promote proper care: risk sexy armenian girls situations and outcomes for young people as well as their college students, Lookup Temporary, Arizona, DC: Youngster Fashion, 2011.
31. DiClemente RJ ainsi que al., Sexual risk practices on the having more mature sex lovers: an examination of black teenage female, Sexually Transmitted Sickness 2002, 29(1):20–24.
32. Fortenberry JD mais aussi al., Condom fool around with because a function of amount of time in the fresh new and founded adolescent sexual relationship, Western Diary away from Societal Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Risk and defensive affairs from the change so you’re able to an initial sexual connection with an older lover, Journal off Adolescent Health, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you may Franzetta K, Birth prevention have fun with activities all over teens’ sexual dating, papers demonstrated at yearly appointment of your own Populace Connection of The united states, Philadelphia, .
thirty five. Manning WD, Giordano Pc and you can Longmore MA, Connecting: the partnership contexts off “nonrelationship” sex, Log out-of Teenage Look, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results off multi-hitched fertility for adult info and you can relationships, report shown during the annual fulfilling of Association to own Societal Rules Studies and Government, Washington, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you will Graefe DR, Shopping for a pal? Brand new relationship and you will cohabitation records away from unwed parents, in: Wu LL and Wolfe B, eds., Out-of Wedlock: Reasons and you can Consequences off Nonmarital Fertility, Nyc: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
40. Kirby D, Growing Responses 2007: Browse Conclusions into Software to attenuate Teenager Pregnancy and you can Sexually Carried Disease, Arizona, DC: National Strategy to stop Adolescent and you can Unexpected Maternity, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The impact from apps to improve birth prevention explore among mature women: a look at experimental and you can quasi-fresh education, Perspectives towards Sexual and you can Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Affiliations
Jennifer Manlove was system town director and you will older lookup scientist, Kate Welti was search scientist, E Wildsmith is actually elderly look researcher and you can Megan Barry was search expert, all the on Child Trend, Bethesda, MD.
History
In the 1st research, that used a district-city sample away from teenagers for the Kansas, Manning and you will associates 9 grouped matchmaking properties with the one index off confident qualities (for example intimate mind-disclosure, passionate like and you can dating salience) plus one list out-of bad characteristics (instance dispute and you will nonexclusivity). They discovered that high ratings toward possibly index was basically of the smaller condom consistency. Detailed analyses in addition to suggested one a mixture of high self-confident and you may highest negative score was of quicker condom consistency.
Into the for every single bullet, users were questioned “Given that day out-of last interview, have you been in the a matchmaking dating in which you envision away from oneself within one or two?” We considered participants to settle an internet dating matchmaking when they responded yes whenever the latest partner is actually a current dating spouse, as opposed to a wife, cohabiting lover otherwise former spouse. Same-sex dating relationship and the ones where in fact the respondent got in earlier times cohabited into the companion was basically omitted. Total, 4,013 respondents reported a current matchmaking relationships through the 2002–2005. Of the kept participants, 553 weren’t about test into the series interesting, step 1,876 was in fact cohabiting or partnered, and 2,542 had no current relationship relationship. Participants in our attempt had been old 18–twenty-six.
Matchmaking relationship are considering a few methods. The original is actually good 0–ten scale in which respondents rated the chance which they and you will its spouse might be to each other in the six months. A get off no expressed no chance; a good ten indicated 100% likelihood. We classified that it opportunities as the reasonable (less than 6), typical (6–9) or high (10). Into 2nd way of measuring union, i incorporated a changeable getting whether the partners had discussed relationship otherwise cohabitation; solutions was in fact classified as talked about neither, discussed cohabitation otherwise chatted about relationships. (Participants whom reported that have discussed one another cohabitation and you can matrimony were integrated regarding wedding category.)
Heterogeneous contraception consequences in this long run relationship may also help determine straight down contraceptive feel during the lengthened teenage relationship, despite deeper probability of previously-the means to access contraceptives. 32, 33 Early in the day research has translated it trying to find because of the positing one to lovers are able to sometimes forgo birth prevention include in much more serious matchmaking; 32, 34 yet not, all of our efficiency advise that less birth control use are centered from inside the long-er term relationships characterized by higher conflict minimizing commitment.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you will Pleck JH, The fresh dynamics away from more youthful men’s room condom explore during and you will across dating, Family members Believed Viewpoints, 1994, 26(6):246–251.